Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1415/2024

Case between The State Bank of India vs M/s A.S Photography & Digital Studio et al regarding realisation of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-23
Duration
approximately-4 years 11 months
Case Code No.
1415
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank of India is suing M/s A.S Photography & Digital Studio and its proprietor Sanal Kumar S.K for the repayment of a loan amounting to ₹7,95,534.10. The defendants failed to meet the terms of the loan agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was decided in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants were ordered to repay the loan amount due along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹7,95,534.10 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was decided in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants were ordered to repay the loan amount due along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence showed the defendants had failed to repay the loan despite the terms of the agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹7,95,534.10 is due from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹7,95,534.10... from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Smt. Beenakumary.S
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o. Sunilkumar V.V
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s A.S Photography & Digital Studio
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanal Kumar S.K
Party Age
37
Relation
S/o. Soman
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application, Original letter of arrangement, Original agreement of loan-cum-hypothecation, Original revival letter, Bank statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anithas Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹7,95,534.10/- (Rupees Seven lakhs Ninety-five Thousand Five Hundred Thirty-four and Ten paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit till date of realization from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is also entitled to costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as the application for the loan availed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original Letter of Arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlines the loan arrangement and terms between the plaintiff and defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Agreement of Loan-cum-hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the secured nature of the loan granted to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original revival letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates attempts to revive the loan account before it became NPA.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding balance and account activity related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 09/23/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 08/23/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won