Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.18/2025

Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr.Sameer KK regarding realisation of money

Court
The Principal Munsiff – I, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt.Meera John K
Order Date
2025-12-04
Duration
approximately-8 years 9 months
Case Closed
Thu, 12/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The State Bank Of India has filed a suit against Mr. Sameer KK, the sole proprietor of M/s Dual Mobile Gallery, for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan despite repeated demands by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs as well.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.4,58,668.59/- with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit and future interest at the rate of 6%.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting them the amount due along with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs as well.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff established the entitlement to the decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of the plaintiff established the entitlement to the decree.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 and Ext.A1 to A14 would show that the plaintiff is entitled to a decree as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,58,668.59/- (Rupees Four Lakh Fifty Eight Thousand Six Hundred Sixty Eight and Fifty Nine paise only)...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank Of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Sameer KK
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
True copy of acquisition of State Bank of Travancore Order 2017, Sanction letter issued by State Bank of Travancore to Sameer KK, Hypothecation cum working capital agreement executed by Sameer KK in favour of State Bank of Travancore, Letter of arrangement issued by State Bank of India to Sameer KK, Supplemental agreement of loan cum Hypothecation issued by Sameer KK to State Bank of India, Revival letter issued by Sameer KK to State Bank of India, Copy of lawyer notice with postal receipt issued by Adv.Vinod Singh Cheriyan to Sameer KK.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Vinod Singh Cheriyan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.T.M.Khalid
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Saranya.O
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Shynu.H
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Seema Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arjun PM
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Mohammed Sinan P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Naveena T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Jeswin James
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of Rs.4,58,668.59 from the defendant.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of Rs.4,58,668.59/-.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of... with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit...
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: True copy of acquisition of State Bank of Travancore Order 2017 published in Gazette of India
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was marked as evidence to support the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter issued by State Bank of Travancore to Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document demonstrates the loan sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Hypothecation cum working capital agreement executed by Sameer KK in favour of State Bank of Travancore
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement served as the security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of arrangement issued by State Bank of India to Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter outlines further arrangements related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Letter of arrangement issued by State Bank of India to Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter provides additional loan arrangement details.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Supplemental agreement of loan cum hypothecation issued by Sameer KK to State Bank of India
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supplements the original hypothecation agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Revival letter issued by Sameer KK to State Bank of India
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter indicates the intent to revive the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Copy of lawyer notice with postal receipt issued by Adv.Vinod Singh Cheriyan to Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was served to demand repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Acknowledgment card with unclaimed cover sent by Adv.Vinod Singh Cheriyan to Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card signifies that communication attempted with the defendant was unsuccessful.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Acknowledgment card with unclaimed cover sent by Adv.Vinod Singh Cheriyan to Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This card further supports the claim of unsuccessful communication.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: True extract of Statement of Account with certificate under Bankers Books Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This extract is used to show the account details and amounts due.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: True extract of Statement of Account with certificate under Bankers Books Evidence Act
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is another extract to support the plaintiff's financial claims.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Certificate showing closure balance of Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This certificate indicates the final amounts owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certificate showing closure balance of Sameer KK
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the closure balance of the account.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr.Sameer KK regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank Of India vs Mr.Sameer KK regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 02/17/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 12/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Shaiju K.P. et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Arathi T.T. regarding recovery of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Rajani P. regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Fathima Aslaha E.P. et al regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Smt.Linsha.N.K et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won