Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 365/2023

Case between State Bank of India vs Rajani P. regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-03-22
Duration
approximately-8 years 31 days
Case Closed
Sat, 03/22/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

State Bank of India filed a suit against Rajani P. for repayment of Rs.9,86,546/- due under various loan agreements. The defendant did not appear in court and the case proceeded ex-parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that Rajani P. shall pay the amount of Rs.9,86,546/- to the plaintiff with interest. The court also granted costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,86,546/- with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that Rajani P. shall pay the amount of Rs.9,86,546/- to the plaintiff with interest. The court also granted costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the case with proper documentation and evidence of the loan defaults.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved the case with proper documentation and evidence of the loan defaults.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1, supported by the documentary evidence, stands unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A) The defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,86,546/- (Rupees nine lakhs eighty six thousand five hundred and forty six only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
State Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajani P.
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application filed by Rajani to SBT, Sanction credit facilities issued by SBT, Hypothecation agreement for term loan executed by Rajani in favour of SBI.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.V. Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. E. Balakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,86,546/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: A) The defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.9,86,546/- (Rupees nine lakhs eighty six thousand five hundred and forty six only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff shall also be entitled to realise the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Cost of the suit shall follow the event.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Submitted as evidence to prove the loan application filed by Rajani to SBI.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction credit facilities
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence indicating the sanction of credit facilities issued by SBI to KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents executed by Rajani in favour of SBI for term loans.
Reference:
Ext.A3 to Ext.A5
Document Type: Letter of arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement detailing the loan arrangements made by SBI and KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Agreement of Loan-cum-Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the agreement between SBI and KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Supplemental Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further documentation of the loan-cum-hypothecation entered into.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter issued by SBI indicating the revival of loan terms.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter of arrangement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the arrangement during the pandemic period.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Supplementary Agreement of loan-cum-hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further supplementary agreement for hypothecation.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Application for Restructuring/ Rehabilitation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Application seeking restructuring of loan due to business decline.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Letter of Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement confirmed between SBI and KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Revival Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Letter indicating the revival of agreements from KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A14
Document Type: Final recall notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to recall all loan accounts from KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A15
Document Type: Ledger Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Records showing the outstanding amounts due by KKR Enterprises.
Reference:
Ext.A16 to Ext.A21

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between State Bank of India vs Rajani P. regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between State Bank of India vs Rajani P. regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 04/08/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/22/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs M/s. Beauty Gold regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Shaiju K.P. et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Arathi T.T. regarding recovery of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank et al vs Fathima Aslaha E.P. et al regarding recovery of loan
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank et al vs Smt.Linsha.N.K et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won