Case Summary
The plaintiffs, including Sivasubramoniam and others, filed a suit against the Chief Secretary and other officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
The court acknowledged that the learned counsel for the plaintiff endorsed that the suit is not pressed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sivasubramoniam
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ananthakrishnan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.S. Giri
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Harikumar. V
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S. Satheesh Kumar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Chief Secretary
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The District Collector
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Special Thahasildar
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B. Hareendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rex D.G Addl. Govt. Pleader & Public Prosecutor
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was not pressed.
Evidence:
The learned counsel for the plaintiff endorsed that the suit is not pressed. Hence, the suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023