Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.366/2024

Case between Sathi Hussain et al vs Newton Akbar et al regarding review petition

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Judge
Sri. ARAVIND P.
Order Date
2025-11-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Sathi Hussain and Fizy Hussain filed a review petition concerning the order in RP. 30/ 2023. The court decided to allow the review petition and restore RP. 30/ 2023 for fresh disposal.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the review petition and restored the case RP. 30/ 2023 for fresh disposal.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the review petition and restored the case RP. 30/ 2023 for fresh disposal.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
this court is of the view that if this petition is not allowed, the review petitions won't able to get a meritorious disposal of RP. 30/ 2023.

Judgment Evidence:

the petition can be allowed. Hence the restoration petition is allowed and order in RP. 30/ 2023 dated 04.12.2024 is reviewed and RP. 30/ 2023 is restored to file for fresh disposal.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sathi Hussain
Party Age
66
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fizy Hussain
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Newton Akbar
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anas Akbar
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Bindhu Ummer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restoration petition is allowed and order in RP. 30/ 2023 dated 04.12.2024 is reviewed and restored to file for fresh disposal.
Evidence:
the petition can be allowed. Hence the restoration petition is allowed and order in RP. 30/ 2023 dated 04.12.2024 is reviewed and RP. 30/ 2023 is restored to file for fresh disposal.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sathi Hussain et al vs Newton Akbar et al regarding review petition
Case Code Year
Case between Sathi Hussain et al vs Newton Akbar et al regarding review petition

Quick Facts

Location
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between R.Rajendran Nair vs Barbara regarding Review Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Nisar. M. J. regarding Review Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Lubina vs Faseela, Parisha regarding review petition
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Review Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Vinod Kumar et al vs Sainudeen regarding review petition
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won
Case between Syamkumar vs Biju, Sanju regarding review petition for rejection of suit due to non-payment of court fee.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Review Petition Defendant Won