Case Summary
Lubina filed a review petition against Faseela and Parisha. The court allowed the petition and restored the suit to file.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Review Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed Lubina's review petition and restored the suit to file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
The court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
The court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Supporting Evidence
After considering the materials this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is allowed. The suit is restored to file.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Lubina
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Faseela
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Parisha
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Lissy Gopal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The petition can be allowed and the suit is restored to file.
Evidence:
After considering the materials this court is of the view that the petition can be allowed. Hence petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Review Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiffs Court, Varkala
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Lubina vs Faseela, Parisha regarding review petition
Case Code Year
Case between Lubina vs Faseela, Parisha regarding review petition