Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.1356/2025

Case between Santhi.A vs Kanakam regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-08-12
Duration
Case Code No.
1356
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Santhi.A, the plaintiff, seeks a temporary injunction against Kanakam, the defendant, to prevent trespassing and obstruction related to the property. The case involves a dispute over the use of a staircase and access to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, preventing the defendant from trespassing and obstructing access to the property until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the counter petitioner/defendants from trespassing and causing obstruction.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, preventing the defendant from trespassing and obstructing access to the property until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case was made out and the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
A prima facie case was made out and the delay in issuing notice would defeat the purpose of injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this IA will defeat the purpose of injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants and her henchmen form trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and dismantling plaint B schedule staircase and form causing obstruction in using the same, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Santhi.A
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kanakam
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S. Rajeev Chempakassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants and her henchmen from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and dismantling plaint B schedule staircase and from causing obstruction in using the same, until further orders.
Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants and her henchmen from trespassing into the plaint A schedule property and dismantling plaint B schedule staircase and from causing obstruction in using the same, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A.M.Shanavas vs A.Nizarudeen, Venugopal Nair regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree.V vs Sreekumar.S.V regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunilkumar. K.V vs Rajeev kumar et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajikumar vs Ramani et al regarding injunction application.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jayasree C.R vs Rajendran.C.V regarding Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won