Case Summary
Sanju M is the plaintiff, and Jayakumar is the defendant. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's failure to prepare for evidence. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not prepared to present evidence.
The plaintiff was not prepared to present evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff no represented. Not ready for adducing evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default. Pronounced in the open court on this 30th day of July, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sanju M
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jayakumar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Shoby Joseph Y
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff not being represented.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sanju M vs Jayakumar regarding dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Sanju M vs Jayakumar regarding dismissal for default.