Case Summary
Sabu Bhaskaran is the plaintiff. The defendants include M/s Ambuja Industries and Rajeswari Amma. The suit was not pressed and was decided on the same day it was heard.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decided as not pressed by the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Both sides represented. Suit not pressed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 20th day of January 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sabu Bhaskaran
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Ambuja Industries
- Relation
- represented by its Sole Proprietor
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajeswari Amma
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vilasini Asokan
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dougles Linsby. N.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Rejith Rajendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sabu Bhaskaran vs M/s Ambuja Industries et al regarding suit not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between Sabu Bhaskaran vs M/s Ambuja Industries et al regarding suit not pressed.