Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.994/2013

Case between Vidhu vs Shantha et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-01-21
Duration
approximately-11 years 8 months
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vidhu is the plaintiff in this case against Shantha and others concerning the dismissal of the suit for default due to no steps being taken by the plaintiff. The court provided repeated directions and opportunities without compliance from the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to take necessary steps despite multiple opportunities provided by the court. The judgment emphasizes the plaintiff's lack of action.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff failed to take necessary steps despite multiple opportunities provided by the court. The judgment emphasizes the plaintiff's lack of action.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court directions.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's failure to comply with court directions.
Supporting Evidence
No steps taken so far even after giving repeated direction and sufficient opportunities.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vidhu
Party Age
29
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shantha
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suthan
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suthevan
Party Age
30
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Corporation of Trivandrum
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Mridul John Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Suresh
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Hence Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vidhu vs Shantha et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Vidhu vs Shantha et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Thu, 05/30/2013 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Anil kumar et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sabu Bhaskaran vs M/s Ambuja Industries et al regarding suit not pressed.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won