Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.340/2022

Case between Ruby Mohamed et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
The Court of Principal Munsiff
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-11-10
Duration
Case Code No.
340
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Ruby Mohamed and S. Faisal, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and others. The court dismissed the case for default as the plaintiffs were absent and not represented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and had no representation, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and had no representation, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence resulted in the case being dismissed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs' absence resulted in the case being dismissed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff absent, no representation. Defendant represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ruby Mohamed
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
S. Faisal
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Principal Secretary ( Electronics and IT )
Relation
Government of Kerala
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Electronics Technology Park ( Technopark )
Relation
represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Chief Executive Officer
Relation
Technopark
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.S. Binod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. D.G. Rex
Appearance Type
Government Pleader
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Abdul Kharim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Thara Kumari.S et al vs Premalatha.S.Nair et al regarding compromise agreement
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won