Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.707/2021

Case between Ravi.C. vs Kerala State Federation Of Scheduled Castes and Sheduled Tribes Development Cooperatives Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt.Sreelakshmi. C
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-7 years 7 months
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ravi.C., the plaintiff, is a tenant operating a gym in a building owned by the defendant. The plaintiff seeks a prohibitory injunction to prevent the defendant from evicting him due to alleged non-payment of rent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction, preventing the defendant from evicting the plaintiff without due process of law. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against forceful eviction
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction, preventing the defendant from evicting the plaintiff without due process of law. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully demonstrated that the defendant had no intention to evict him without following due process, and the court found the defendant's challenge to be unsustainable.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully demonstrated that the defendant had no intention to evict him without following due process, and the court found the defendant's challenge to be unsustainable.
Supporting Evidence
Considering the aforesaid facts, plaintiff is entitled for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against forceful eviction as the defendant himself undertook that he will not forcefully evict the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is restrained from causing any disturbance to the smooth running of the plaintiff’s business in the plaint schedule building or dispossessing him therefrom otherwise than due process of law.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ravi.C.
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kerala State Federation Of Scheduled Castes and Sheduled Tribes Development Cooperatives Ltd.
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
The copy of lease agreement dated 12/01/2018, receipt No.0753365 issued by Municipal Corporation, Thiruvananthapuram dated 20/04/2021, registration certificate dated 04/11/2019, show cause notice dated 21/01/2021
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.A.Ahamed
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Jayachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Vidhya Chandran.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.Aravind Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Kulathoor S.V. Premakumaran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from forcefully evicting him.
Evidence:
Considering the aforesaid facts, plaintiff is entitled for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against forceful eviction as the defendant himself undertook that he will not forcefully evict the plaintiff from the plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lease Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The copy of lease agreement indicating the terms under which the plaintiff occupies the building.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The receipt issued by the Municipal Corporation for conducting business.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The certification required for the plaintiff's business.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Show Cause Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice issued by the defendant alleging issues against the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ravi.C. vs Kerala State Federation Of Scheduled Castes and Sheduled Tribes Development Cooperatives Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ravi.C. vs Kerala State Federation Of Scheduled Castes and Sheduled Tribes Development Cooperatives Ltd. regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 01/12/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 08/26/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sabu Bhaskaran vs M/s Ambuja Industries et al regarding suit not pressed.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vidhu vs Shantha et al regarding dismissal for default
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won