Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1629/2019

Case between Raveendran Nair.K. vs Dr.Sathish.D.K, The Director of Collegiate Education et al regarding cross-examination rights.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-09-18
Duration
Case Code No.
1629
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a petition by Dr.Sathish.D.K, the first defendant, regarding cross-examination of a witness, PW1, by the petitioner. The court decided to grant the petitioner an opportunity to cross-examine the witness while imposing costs on the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitioner's request for cross-examination of the witness, PW1, while imposing nominal costs due to delays caused.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Opportunity to cross-examine PW1 and payment of costs of Rs.2,000/- to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitioner's request for cross-examination of the witness, PW1, while imposing nominal costs due to delays caused.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it fair to allow the petitioner to cross-examine the witness after noting the lack of cross-examination.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
At the same time, a nominal costs can be imposed on the petitioner considering the delay and inconvenience caused to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

Having considered submissions of both sides, I am of the view that it would only be fair and just to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to cross-examine the PW1.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Raveendran Nair.K.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dr.Sathish.D.K
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Director of Collegiate Education
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P.Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Manikandan Nair.A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Pallichal.S.Aswakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Government Pleader
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Opportunity to cross examine PW1 granted to the petitioner
Evidence:
Having considered submissions of both sides, I am of the view that it would only be fair and just to grant one opportunity to the petitioner to cross examine the PW1.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of Rs. 2,000/- imposed on the petitioner
Evidence:
a nominal costs can be imposed on the petitioner considering the delay and inconvenience caused to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Thara Kumari.S et al vs Premalatha.S.Nair et al regarding compromise agreement
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won