Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.1225/2017

Case between Ragehsh et al vs Jayan et al regarding stay of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-11-27
Duration
Case Code No.
1225
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves a petition filed by the defendants to stay the suit pending the disposal of an appeal in RFA No.99/2006 related to the same property and parties. The plaintiffs argue that prior litigation does not bind them due to their minor status at the time.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to stay the trial until the disposal of RFA 99/2006 was allowed by the court. It was determined that the conditions of the Civil Procedure Code were met for this request.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The petition to stay the trial until the disposal of RFA 99/2006 was allowed by the court. It was determined that the conditions of the Civil Procedure Code were met for this request.
Key Reasoning:
The petition was allowed based on the substantial identity of the matter between the current suit and the previously filed suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The petition was allowed based on the substantial identity of the matter between the current suit and the previously filed suit.
Supporting Evidence
I find that there is substantial identity between the matters in dispute and parties in both the suits.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, IA is allowed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ragehsh
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valsala
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mini
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Leela
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ajayan
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Soman Nadar
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S. Kalkura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Counter Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. Williams
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Counter Petitioner
Advocate Name
Sri. Ajun krishna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Stay the suit till the disposal of RFA 99/2006 pending before the Hon’ble High Court of Kerala.
Evidence:
I find there are sufficient grounds to invoke Sec.10 of CPC to stay the trial of this suit till disposal of the RFA.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2017

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sangeetha et al vs Girija Ity et al regarding impleading additional defendants.
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between N. Krishnankutty vs Sunil.S regarding securing property
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Murali kumar vs Subramaya pillai et al regarding compromise petition.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreekumari.K vs Thulasi et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Padmini.A vs Shiju.A regarding Permanent prohibitory injunction
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-RCC
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won