Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.1721/2025

Case between Peter Joseph vs Shajan Joseph regarding injunction

Court
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri. Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-10-18
Duration
Case Code No.
1721
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Peter Joseph and Sharan Joseph are the plaintiffs seeking an injunction against Shajan Joseph and Jui Olivei Gomes, the defendants. The case involves a temporary injunction to prevent the defendants from disturbing the plaintiffs' peaceful possession of property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiffs against the defendants to prevent any disturbance. The plaintiffs must comply with specific procedural requirements.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction restraining the defendants from disturbing the plaintiffs' peaceful life and possession.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiffs against the defendants to prevent any disturbance. The plaintiffs must comply with specific procedural requirements.
Why Plaintiff Won:
A prima facie case is made out, indicating urgency in preventing disturbance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this IA will defeat the purpose of injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition is coming on for hearing on this day and court passed the following Order: Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. Perused the affidavit and documents. I am satisfied that a prima facie case is made out and the delay in issuing notice in this IA will defeat the purpose of injunction. Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants and their men from committing any waste, nuisance or disturbance to the peaceful life and possession of the first petitioner/plaintiff in the building situate in the plait schedule property, until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Peter Joseph
Party Age
87
Relation
S/o Late Peter Francis
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sharan Joseph
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o Peter Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shajan Joseph
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o Peter Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jui Olivei Gomes
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o Shajan Joseph
Plaintiffs Documents
Affidavit and various supporting documents submitted by the plaintiffs.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Thomas Kochenayil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restraining the counter petitioner/defendants from committing any waste, nuisance or disturbance to the peaceful life and possession of the first petitioner/plaintiff in the building situate in the plait schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence, temporary injunction is granted restraining the counter petitioner/defendants and their men from committing any waste, nuisance or disturbance to the peaceful life and possession of the first petitioner/plaintiff in the building situate in the plait schedule property, until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A.M.Shanavas vs A.Nizarudeen, Venugopal Nair regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree.V vs Sreekumar.S.V regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunilkumar. K.V vs Rajeev kumar et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajikumar vs Ramani et al regarding injunction application.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jayasree C.R vs Rajendran.C.V regarding Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won