Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
E.P. 16/2025

Case between Othandavida Vayalil Ahammed Haji et al vs Kousalya et al regarding Rent Recovery

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri.Vivek.P
Order Date
2025-04-11
Duration
Case Code No.
16
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners are seeking rent recovery against the respondents, who are the judgment debtors. The court made a decision regarding the revival of the rent control proceedings and closure of the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the Rent Recovery and revived the Rent Control Proceedings. The Execution Petition was closed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the Rent Recovery and revived the Rent Control Proceedings. The Execution Petition was closed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found in favor of the petitioners based on the merits of the case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found in favor of the petitioners based on the merits of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The court's decision to allow the Rent Recovery is based on the procedural merits presented during the hearing.

Judgment Evidence:

RPIA allowed. RCP revived. EP closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Othandavida Vayalil Ahammed Haji
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Othandavida Vayalil Abdul Asees Haji
Party Age
68
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Suhara
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shahida
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashraf
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kousalya
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nikhitha
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Daksh
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gireesh.P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. N. Rajendra Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
RPIA allowed. RCP revived. EP closed.
Evidence:
RPIA allowed. RCP revived. EP closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2025

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Fousiya.T.A et al vs Lay Arabia Restaurant et al regarding Rent recovery.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V.Rajalakshmi et al vs Padmadas regarding Rent Control proceedings.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between N.Sameema et al vs Haridasan regarding Rent Control.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Abdul Basheer.A.K et al vs Abdul Sathar regarding delivery of possession.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi et al vs T.V. Zeenath et al regarding Rent Control
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won