Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 89/2024

Case between Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi et al vs T.V. Zeenath et al regarding Rent Control

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi and Bayaram Veettil Salma alias Imbichipathummabi, are involved in a rent control petition against the respondents T.V. Zeenath and C. Muhammed Aslam. The matter was settled out of court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
Matter settled and the rent control petition was dismissed in view of the statement filed by the petitioner.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
Matter settled and the rent control petition was dismissed in view of the statement filed by the petitioner.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Settlement recorded as per the agreement between the parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Settlement recorded as per the agreement between the parties.
Supporting Evidence
Settlement recorded as per the agreement between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner represented. Matter settled. Statement filed. Respondent handed over the key. Settlement recorded. RCP dismissed in view of the statement filed by the petitioner.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi
Party Age
90
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bayaram Veettil Salma alias Imbichipathummabi
Party Age
87
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.V. Zeenath
Party Age
56
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Muhammed Aslam
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K. Sivadasan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sajna Mohammadali
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Raghukumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Abhila A.P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Matter settled and RCP dismissed in view of the statement filed by the petitioner
Evidence:
Matter settled. Statement filed. Respondent handed over the key. Settlement recorded. RCP dismissed in view of the statement filed by the petitioner.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi et al vs T.V. Zeenath et al regarding Rent Control
Case Code Year
Case between Bayaram Veettil Ummayabi et al vs T.V. Zeenath et al regarding Rent Control

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between N.Sameema et al vs Haridasan regarding Rent Control.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Othandavida Vayalil Ahammed Haji et al vs Kousalya et al regarding Rent Recovery
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Basheer.A.K et al vs Abdul Sathar regarding delivery of possession.
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Plaintiff Won
Case between Rabiya vs IK Krishnadas et al regarding rent control
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won
Case between Prajena P.V. vs Subhashini V.P. regarding Rent Control
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Defendant Won