Case Summary
The petitioners include Fousiya.T.A and others, while the respondents include Lay Arabia Restaurant and its managing partner. The case concerns a rent recovery issue.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the delivery effectuation and closed the execution petition.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Delivery effected. EP closed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fousiya.T.A
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asma
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Parakandi Iqubal
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shakeena Nissar
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lay Arabia Restaurant
- Relation
- Rep.By Managing partner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muhammed Shamsuddhin
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- Managing partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Muhammed Iqubal
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
E.P.
Case Code Year
2024