Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1490 /2023

Case between N.R. Sreelekha vs S. Sujatha et al regarding mediation settlement.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-09-22
Duration
Case Code No.
1490
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

N.R. Sreelekha is the plaintiff in this case against S. Sujatha and S. Bindhu, along with L. Seethamma. The suit concerns a dispute that was resolved through mediation, whereby the court decreed the case in accordance with the mediation agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The case was finally heard and a settlement was reached between the plaintiff and the first and second defendants, leading to a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree in terms of the mediation agreement.
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The case was finally heard and a settlement was reached between the plaintiff and the first and second defendants, leading to a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The matter was settled through mediation, and the agreement was decreed by the court.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The matter was settled through mediation, and the agreement was decreed by the court.
Supporting Evidence
The court delivered the judgment based on the mediation report filed by the parties involved.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement. The mediation agreement shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
N.R. Sreelekha
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Sujatha
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
S. Bindhu
Party Age
51
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
L. Seethamma
Party Age
84
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation report.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Renadive
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.D. Padmini Rose
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Chinchu K.C
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Priya S.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Geethu C.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.V. Hemaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of the mediation agreement.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
No relief is sought against the third defendant.
Evidence:
Memo filed stating that, no relief is sought against third defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won