Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 314/2021

Case between Naniyatt Moideenkoya vs Muhammadali K K @ Ali K K regarding realisation of money

Court
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Savitha.T.P
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 days
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Naniyatt Moideenkoya is the plaintiff seeking to recover money from Muhammadali K K @ Ali K K. The case involves a partnership agreement related to a fishing business and the non-payment of profits.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff a total of Rs.2,47,800 along with specified interests and cancelled the partnership agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay Rs.2,47,800 to the plaintiff and interest at specified rates.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendant must pay the plaintiff a total of Rs.2,47,800 along with specified interests and cancelled the partnership agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the investment and the agreement terms through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the investment and the agreement terms through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The Payment of money as per the partnership agreement is proved by the plaintiff to the defendant is proved through Ext.A1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The defendant is directed to pay Rs.2,47,800/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Seven Thousand And Eight Hundred Only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naniyatt Moideenkoya
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammadali K K @ Ali K K
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o.
Plaintiffs Documents
Partnership agreement dated 15.6.2020, Copy of lawyer notice, Unserved notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt K.P.Regha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.M.Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover Rs.2,47,800/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.2,47,800/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Forty Seven Thousand And Eight Hundred Only) to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 7% per annum from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay an interest at the rate of 7% per annum for the amount Rs.2,10,000/- (Two lakhs And Ten Thousand only) from the date of the suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of decree till realization.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay an interest at the rate of 6% per annum for the amount Rs.2,10,000/- (Two lakhs And Ten Thousand only) from the date of decree till realization.
Relief Type: Cancellation
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The agreement Ext.A1 is cancelled.
Evidence:
Ext.A1 agreement dated 15.6.2020 is cancelled and would not be binding on plaintiff.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The defendant is also directed to pay costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partnership Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The agreement proves that the plaintiff invested Rs.2,10,000/- and outlines the terms of partnership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The notice is evidence of the plaintiff's claim regarding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Unserved notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The unserved notice supports the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Naniyatt Moideenkoya vs Muhammadali K K @ Ali K K regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Naniyatt Moideenkoya vs Muhammadali K K @ Ali K K regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 06/15/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s.Kerala Trade Wings vs Shoukathali regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ace Finlease Pvt.Ltd. vs Harshad.M.H et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nakkottil Beefathima vs Mr.Jaganathan Kandiyil regarding recovery of money
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won