Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 142/2022

Case between Nakkottil Beefathima vs Mr.Jaganathan Kandiyil regarding recovery of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Meera John.K
Order Date
2025-01-27
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Nakkottil Beefathima, the plaintiff, is seeking recovery of a sum due from the defendant, Mr.Jaganathan Kandiyil, regarding license fee arrears and TDS liabilities as per a license agreement. The case arises from dishonoured cheques issued by the defendant towards the said arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court directed the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.1,83,347/- with interest to the plaintiff. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.1,83,347/- with interest and costs
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court directed the defendant to pay an amount of Rs.1,83,347/- with interest to the plaintiff. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff, coupled with the unchallenged documents, established the claim for recovery of dues.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence of the plaintiff, coupled with the unchallenged documents, established the claim for recovery of dues.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A10 remains unchallenged. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to get a decree as sought for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1)The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,83,347/- (Rupees one lakh eighty three thousand three hundred and forty seven only) with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest at 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Nakkottil Beefathima
Party Age
58
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mr.Jaganathan Kandiyil
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified copy of licence agreement between plaintiff and defendant, Settlement agreement between plaintiff and defendant, Certified copy of Cheque bearing No. 392129 drawn on Syndicate Bank.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.K.K.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Akhilraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Arungopal P.G.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a total sum from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize from the defendant a total sum of Rs.1,21,340/- (Rupees one lakh twenty one thousand three hundred and forty only) along with interest and notice charges.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Licence agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the terms of the licence arrangement and security deposit.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the arrangement regarding payment of arrears and issuance of cheques.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the defendant, which was returned dishonoured.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document evidencing the return of the first cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another cheque issued by the defendant towards payment of arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Cheque Return Memo
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document evidencing the return of the second cheque due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant regarding the dishonour of the first cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant regarding the dishonour of the second cheque.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Record of legal proceedings related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document empowering the representative of the plaintiff in legal matters.
Reference:
Ext.A10

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Nakkottil Beefathima vs Mr.Jaganathan Kandiyil regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Nakkottil Beefathima vs Mr.Jaganathan Kandiyil regarding recovery of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 03/21/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s.Kerala Trade Wings vs Shoukathali regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ace Finlease Pvt.Ltd. vs Harshad.M.H et al regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won