Case Summary
The plaintiff, Muhammed Yasir B.S., is a sole proprietor who entered into a lease agreement with the defendants for manufacturing hollow bricks. The plaintiff claims that the defendants failed to return the security deposit and other costs after the production could not commence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants shall jointly and severally pay an amount of Rs.5,08,200/- with interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the defendants must pay the plaintiff a total of Rs.5,08,200/- along with interest for the breach of the lease agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved his case and entitlement to relief.
The plaintiff successfully proved his case and entitlement to relief.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved his case and entitlement to relief.
The plaintiff successfully proved his case and entitlement to relief.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1, supported by the documentary evidence, stands unchallenged. As such this court finds that the plaintiff has succeeded to prove his case and he is entitled to a decree as prayed for.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: A) The defendants shall jointly and severally pay an amount of Rs.5,08,200/- (Rupees five lakh eight thousand and two hundred only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Yasir B.S.
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shivaram Shetty
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shambavi Shetty @ @Sumathi
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of lease agreement entered into between Shivaram Shetty and Baria exports, Copy of lawyer notice sent by Adv. C.P. Ajayakumar to Shivaram Shetty, Postal receipt, Acknowledgment, Copy of Statement of Account of Baria exports in favour of Canara Bank.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.P. Ajayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The defendants shall jointly and severally pay an amount of Rs.5,08,200/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendants shall jointly and severally pay an amount of Rs.5,08,200/- (Rupees five lakh eight thousand and two hundred only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6% from the date of decree till realisation of decree amount.
Relief Type:
Cost of Suit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The plaintiff shall also be entitled to realise the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Cost of the suit shall follow the event.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Lease Agreement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the lease agreement entered into between Shivaram Shetty and Baria Exports.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Lawyer Notice
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the lawyer notice sent by Adv. C.P. Ajayakumar to Shivaram Shetty.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Postal receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the postal receipt related to the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Acknowledgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the acknowledgment of receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Bank statement
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the statement of account of Baria Exports in favour of Canara Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Yasir B.S. vs Shivaram Shetty et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Yasir B.S. vs Shivaram Shetty et al regarding realisation of money