Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT No.235 OF 2015

Case between Muhammed Ashraf et al vs Abdul Latheef et al regarding property injunction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2018-02-07
Duration
2 years 8 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff sought permanent prohibitory injunction to prevent obstruction and encroachment on their property. Defendants were restrained by the court from causing any interference with plaintiff's peaceful possession.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted permanent prohibitory injunction restraining defendants from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession of the property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent prohibitory injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the exclusive ownership and possession of the property with cogent and reliable evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result the suit is decreed as follows:- Defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from making any obstruction to the plaintiff in his peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property or from encroaching into plaint schedule property or setting out a way or from remove the stones stored by plaintiff in the plaint schedule property. Defendant shall pay cost of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Muhammed Ashraf (53 years) Thirunnavaya amsom

Defendants

Abdul Latheef (35 years) Thirunnavaya amsom Velladath Moideen (54 years) Thirunnavaya amsom

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To prevent obstruction and encroachment on the plaintiff's property
Evidence:
In the result the suit is decreed as follows:- Defendant is restrained by way of permanent prohibitory injunction from making any obstruction to the plaintiff in his peaceful possession of the plaint schedule property or from encroaching into plaint schedule property or setting out a way or from remove the stones stored by plaintiff in the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Jenm Assignment Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document dated 26-03-2003 proving ownership
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Photographic evidence of the property
Reference:
A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Sat, 02/07/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Grama Panchayath

Similar Cases