Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
Original Suit No. 91 of 2014

Case between Mohamed Bava vs Ashraf et al regarding access obstruction

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V., B.A, L.L.B., Munsiff
Order Date
2016-08-29
Duration
2 years 1 month
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Plaintiff Mohamed Bava sought permanent prohibitory injunction against defendants to prevent obstruction in using the road to access his property as per an agreement executed for forming the public way.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction in favor of the plaintiff and awarded costs against the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Type
Civil Suit - Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to appear in court despite filing a written statement disputing the plaintiff's claims.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff from taking vehicle and passing and re-passing through the B schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Mohamed Bava (62 years) Kallingal House, Tanalur Amsom Desom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Ashraf (38 years) Narunglil House Rukhiya (45 years) Kizhakenkara House Shamsudheen (29 years) Methukayil House Sahira (26 years) Methukayil House Ummeriya (Age not specified years) Narungalil House

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Restrain defendants from obstructing plaintiff's access through the B schedule property
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are restrained by a permanent prohibitory injunction from causing any obstruction to the plaintiff from taking vehicle and passing and re-passing through the B schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Certified Copy of Jenm Assignment deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showed ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement of conveyance
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting the formation of the public road.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Commissioner's Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Corroborating the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Providing visual evidence related to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Fri, 08/29/2014 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases