Case Summary
The plaintiffs, M/s Saj Distributors and its partners, are involved in a legal dispute with the defendants, M/s Bharti Airtel Limited. The case revolves around a matter that has been referred for Arbitration.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Matter referred for Arbitration under Sec.8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the application and referred the matter for Arbitration. Therefore, the suit has been disposed of.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found grounds to allow the application and refer the matter for Arbitration as per legal provisions.
The court found grounds to allow the application and refer the matter for Arbitration as per legal provisions.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found grounds to allow the application and refer the matter for Arbitration as per legal provisions.
The court found grounds to allow the application and refer the matter for Arbitration as per legal provisions.
Supporting Evidence
The court found grounds to allow the application and refer the matter for Arbitration as per legal provisions.
Judgment Evidence:
IA 1/2022 allowed and matter referred for Arbitration under Sec.8 of Arbitration and conciliation Act. Hence suit disposed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- M/s Saj Distributors
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- S.Sajikumar
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Abraham Jacob Eapen
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Bharti Airtel Limited
- Relation
- represented by its Chief Executive Officer and Director
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s Bharti Airtel Limited
- Relation
- represented by its Authorised Signatory
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. J. Harikumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.V. Vinodkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Neeraj.C.B.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.S.Bhasurendran Nair
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
IA 1/2022 allowed and matter referred for Arbitration under Sec.8 of Arbitration and conciliation Act.
Evidence:
IA 1/2022 allowed and matter referred for Arbitration under Sec.8 of Arbitration and conciliation Act.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Saj Distributors et al vs M/s Bharti Airtel Limited regarding Arbitration matter
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Saj Distributors et al vs M/s Bharti Airtel Limited regarding Arbitration matter