Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1730/2023

Case between M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd vs Omana.B et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-02-10
Duration
approximately-6 years 9 months
Case Code No.
1730
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd filed a suit against Omana.B and Sasi.N for the realisation of a loan amount of ₹48,839/- due to irregular repayment. The defendants did not appear in court, and the case was heard ex-parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of ₹48,839/- with interest and the costs of the suit from the defendants. The defendants were found liable for the payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹48,839/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets, along with the costs of this suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the recovery of ₹48,839/- with interest and the costs of the suit from the defendants. The defendants were found liable for the payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff established the defendants' liability to repay the amount due, as the defendants failed to discharge their obligations.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence adduced by the plaintiff established the defendants' liability to repay the amount due, as the defendants failed to discharge their obligations.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence provided by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹48,839/- is due from the defendants. The documents produced by the plaintiff prove that the defendants are liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: -(a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹48,839/- (Rupees Forty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty-Nine only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Mulamoottil Consumer Credits Ltd
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vineeth V.S
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Omana.B
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sasi. N
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Demand Promissory Note dated 27.04.2018, Hypothecation Agreement dated 27.04.2018, Statement of account, Advocate’s Notice dated 03.03.2023
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Prasanna Kumar Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Renjini. N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover an amount of ₹48,839/- with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 48,839 ₹ /- (Rupees Forty-Eight Thousand Eight Hundred and Thirty-Nine only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to realize the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants on 27/04/2018 as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendants on 27/04/2018 as security for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified statement showing the outstanding balance owed by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of the advocate’s notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendants to repay the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipts related to the sending of the advocate's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 04/27/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won