Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No.573/2020

Case between M/s. Ganesh Cloth Mart vs C. Haridas et al regarding return of advance money and mandatory injunction.

Court
The Court of the Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Meera John.K
Order Date
2025-01-10
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Closed
Fri, 01/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/s. Ganesh Cloth Mart, leased shop rooms from the defendants, C. Haridas and Chaliyil Shimla. After the lease term ended, the plaintiff sought the return of advance money due to business loss and non-compliance from the defendants.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to receive the shop room keys and pay the plaintiff a total of Rs.1,56,006/- with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants are directed to receive the key of the shop rooms and to pay an amount of Rs.1,56,006/- with 6% interest.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to receive the shop room keys and pay the plaintiff a total of Rs.1,56,006/- with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A4 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A4 would prove the case of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A4 would prove the case of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants are directed by way of mandatory injunction to receive the key of the shop rooms. Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,56,006/- (Rupees one lakh fifty six thousand and six only) with 6% interest from date of suit till its realisation. Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s. Ganesh Cloth Mart
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C. Haridas
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chaliyil Shimla
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Photocopy of Rent Agreement executed between Plaintiff’s firm and defendants, Copies of Lawyer notices.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Simon Chacko
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.R.Sheeja
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.P.Rajmohan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to receive the key of the shop rooms.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed by way of mandatory injunction to receive the key of the shop rooms.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,56,006/- with interest.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.1,56,006/- (Rupees one lakh fifty six thousand and six only) with 6% interest from date of suit till its realisation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Defendants are directed to pay costs of the suit to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the leasing terms between the plaintiff and defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendants about the plaintiff's demands.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the second lawyer notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2(b)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of postal communication related to the second lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2(c)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A2(d)
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendants about follow-up demands by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the third lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(b)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of postal communication related to the third lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(c)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Further evidence of postal communication.
Reference:
Ext.A3(d)
Document Type: Partnership Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supports the plaintiff's claims regarding the partnership.
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/s. Ganesh Cloth Mart vs C. Haridas et al regarding return of advance money and mandatory injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Ganesh Cloth Mart vs C. Haridas et al regarding return of advance money and mandatory injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 07/06/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.Brijosh.K vs P.K.Gireesh regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Valappil Abdurahiman vs Maliyekkal Fasil regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V.Abu Faizal vs Smt.Saajitha.T regarding realisation of arrears of rent
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won