Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 729/2019

Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.MEERA JOHN.K
Order Date
2025-01-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 6 months
Case Closed
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, T.K.Chidanand, filed a suit against the defendant, Shahabas, seeking a mandatory injunction for the recovery of rental payments and possession of property. The defendant had allegedly failed to pay the agreed license fees for the use of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay the outstanding license fees with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Mandatory injunction for the defendant to vacate the property and payment of Rs.2,80,000/- as license fee arrears.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to vacate the property and pay the outstanding license fees with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff's unchallenged evidence supported his claims regarding license fee arrears.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A6, C1, C2, C3 would prove the case of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to vacate from the plaint schedule property after taking all his belongings. 2) The defendant is directed to pay Rs.2,80,000/- as licence fee arrears...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K.Chidanand
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shahabas
Party Age
31
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original licence agreement A1, Registered lawyer notice A2, Copy of lawyer notice A3.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.G.Manohar Lal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sanal Kumar Padannapurath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to vacate from the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed by way of mandatory injunction to vacate from the plaint schedule property after taking all his belongings.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay Rs.2,80,000/- as license fee arrears.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.2,80,000/- (Rupees two lakhs eighty thousand only) as licence fee arrears from 01.06.2019 till 01.10.2019 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay Rs.70,000/- for the subsequent licensing period.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.70,000/- (Rupees seventy thousand only) from 01.10.2019 till 28.01.2023 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to pay Rs.77,000/- as license fee arrears for the previous period.
Evidence:
The defendant is directed to pay Rs.77,000/- (Rupees seventy seven thousand only) as licence fee arrears from 01.07.2018 till 31.05.2019 with interest at 12% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and with interest @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till its realization to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original Licence Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the licensing terms between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Photocopy of Registered lawyer notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence of the notice sent to the defendant regarding licence fee arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the demand made by the plaintiff to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the failed delivery of legal notices.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional evidence of communication sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as confirmation of postal dispatch for the notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates further attempts to communicate with the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Provides findings pertinent to the case.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Additional findings relevant to the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.C2
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Further substantiation of the evidence considered by the court.
Reference:
Ext.C3
Document Type: Commissioner’s sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Illustrates the location and nature of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C3(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.
Case Code Year
Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sat, 06/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A.T.Ummushereefa vs Drishya.K.T regarding mandatory injunction
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.Brijosh.K vs P.K.Gireesh regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Valappil Abdurahiman vs Maliyekkal Fasil regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V.Abu Faizal vs Smt.Saajitha.T regarding realisation of arrears of rent
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won