Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.756/2024

Case between M/s Damodar Corporation vs M/s Canara Bank et al regarding dismissal as not pressed.

Court
IN THE COURT OF I st ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Smt. Karthika.A.R
Order Date
2025-02-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves M/s Damodar Corporation as the plaintiff and M/s Canara Bank and M/s Ponnamkulam Brothers as defendants. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed by the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff filed a memo stating they do not wish to proceed with the case. Hence, the court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff filed a memo stating they do not wish to proceed with the case. Hence, the court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/s Damodar Corporation
Party Age
71
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Canara Bank
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Ponnamkulam Brothers
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M R Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Joseph Stephenson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Gopinathan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Arun V G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Jaya Ragi V.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abhijith Jacob R J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed
Evidence:
Plaintiff filed not press memo. Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s Damodar Corporation vs M/s Canara Bank et al regarding dismissal as not pressed.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s Damodar Corporation vs M/s Canara Bank et al regarding dismissal as not pressed.

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Sabu Bhaskaran vs M/s Ambuja Industries et al regarding suit not pressed.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Vidhu vs Shantha et al regarding dismissal for default
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Geo Expert Pvt Ltd. vs Justin.V.S regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mithun John Mathew vs Grama Seva Samithy Grandhasala regarding mediation agreement.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M.V. Shafi, M.V. Shanavas vs M M. Vahabudeen, M.V. Shaji, M.V. Shereef regarding declaration of property partitions
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won