Case Summary
M/s. Benhur Chits(P) is the petitioner represented by its power of Attorney holder Prakashkumar. The respondents include Purushothaman.T.P, Mini.T.P, and Basheer Palakkal, concerning an enquiry to means.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition has been dismissed due to the decree holder not being represented and no steps taken for enquiry to means.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Prakashkumar
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Purushothaman.T.P
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mini.T.P
- Party Age
- 49
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Basheer Palakkal
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Parameswaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Madhumohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Dileep.V.C.S
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP dismissed for default.
Evidence:
EP dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between M/s. Benhur Chits(P) vs Purushothaman.T.P et al regarding enquiry to means.
Case Code Year
Case between M/s. Benhur Chits(P) vs Purushothaman.T.P et al regarding enquiry to means.