Case Summary
The case involves Union Bank of India as the petitioner and Abdul Tharis as the respondent. It is an execution petition related to a decree against the respondent.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court has set aside the ex parte decree and closed the execution petition.
Key Reasoning:
The ex parte decree was set aside based on a submitted application.
The ex parte decree was set aside based on a submitted application.
Why Defendant Won:
The ex parte decree was set aside based on a submitted application.
The ex parte decree was set aside based on a submitted application.
Supporting Evidence
Learned counsel for judgment debtor submitted that exparte decree set aside vide order in RPIA 60/2024.
Judgment Evidence:
EP closed. Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 27th day of February, 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Tharis
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Petitioner
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Smitha Dharmaraj
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Respondent
- Advocate Name
- Sri. B.M. Shamsudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Abdul Tharis regarding execution of decree
Case Code Year
Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Abdul Tharis regarding execution of decree