Case Summary
Pulikkal Riyas filed a petition against M.P. Suharabi regarding an execution petition. The court found the decree holder not represented and dismissed the EP for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the execution petition due to the decree holder not being represented.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was not represented in court.
The decree holder was not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was not represented in court.
The decree holder was not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The decree holder not represented.
Judgment Evidence:
EP dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Pulikkal Riyas
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.P. Suharabi
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A.K. Sukumaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
EP dismissed for default due to the decree holder not being represented and bata not being paid.
Evidence:
Decree holder not represented. Batta not paid. EP dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Pulikkal Riyas vs M.P. Suharabi regarding EP dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Pulikkal Riyas vs M.P. Suharabi regarding EP dismissal