Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.831/2011

Case between Manohar vs Travancore Devasom Board et al regarding declaration, injunction and allied relief concerning property rights.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S, Principal Munsiff
Order Date
2025-07-10
Duration
approximately-14 years
Case Code No.
831
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves the applicant, Manohar, seeking a declaration and an injunction related to a property, originally part of 60 cents but reduced after a road acquisition. The defendants, including the Travancore Devasom Board and the State of Kerala, are involved in claims over the property, which the applicant argues was wrongly assessed as belonging to a temple.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court has allowed the application filed by the plaintiff, enabling further examination of absent parties to clarify critical facts regarding the property dispute.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has allowed the application filed by the plaintiff, enabling further examination of absent parties to clarify critical facts regarding the property dispute.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it necessary to clarify critical facts by allowing the examination of absent parties to ensure a fair adjudication.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court finds it appropriate to exercise such jurisdiction and direct the examination of the absent parties to ensure a fair and complete adjudication of this case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result: The application is allowed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manohar
Party Age
75
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Travancore Devasom Board
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sub Group Office
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
State of Kerala
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V. Suresh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K. Nagendran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Rex. D.G
Appearance Type
Government Pleader

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The application to compel the examination of revenue officials was allowed.
Evidence:
This Court finds it appropriate to exercise such jurisdiction and direct the examination of the absent parties to ensure a fair and complete adjudication of this case.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Re-survey Field Operations Records
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
These records were relied upon by the 1st respondent to substantiate their claims regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.B1 and Ext.B2
Document Type: Intimation Letter from Head Surveyor's Office
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter called upon the applicant to appear with original title deeds and tax receipts for rectification of the re-survey number.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2011

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 01/01/2011 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Government

Similar Cases

Case between Thara Kumari.S et al vs Premalatha.S.Nair et al regarding compromise agreement
IN THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Cindrella Darthalis vs The State of Kerala et al regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.R. Amritha vs State of Kerala, The Secretary to Government, Public Works Department, Vilapil Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissing for default.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Noorjahan vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between S.Sreejith.IPS vs K.M.Shajahan regarding damages
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won