Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No.674/2019

Case between Manju.V.A vs Sathi.K.T. regarding restoration of a previously dismissed petition

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-2 years 10 months
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Manju.V.A filed a restoration petition for a suit that was previously dismissed for default. The court had to consider if valid reasons were provided for the dismissal to be set aside.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the restoration petition due to the petitioner's failure to provide justifiable reasons for the previous dismissal. The court found the petitioner's claims to be based on false premises.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the restoration petition due to the petitioner's failure to provide justifiable reasons for the previous dismissal. The court found the petitioner's claims to be based on false premises.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the petitioner failed to show valid reasons for her absence at the previous proceedings and submitted false information.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the petitioner failed to show valid reasons for her absence at the previous proceedings and submitted false information.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioner is unaware of her own status and is submitting false statements before the court, is not entitled to any relief from the court.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; The petition is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Manju.V.A
Party Age
37
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sathi.K.T.
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.S.I.Shah
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.R. Anandakuttan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The petition to restore the RP back to file was rejected.
Evidence:
In light of the above-referred decision and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the view that the petitioner, who is unaware of her own status and is submitting false statements before the court, is not entitled to any relief from the court.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Manju.V.A vs Sathi.K.T. regarding restoration of a previously dismissed petition
Case Code Year
Case between Manju.V.A vs Sathi.K.T. regarding restoration of a previously dismissed petition

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 04/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 04/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between John Nirmal Thomas vs Mohanlal et al regarding restoration of the suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, VARKALA
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Lekha A, Jayachandran V regarding restoration of petition
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Restoration Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs V.Lali et al regarding Restoration Petition
Court of Additional Munsiff -III
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Kunjumon.T regarding restoration of petitions
Principal Munsiff Court
Restoration Petition Defendant Won
Case between State of Kerala, Chief chemical examiner vs Dr N. Kumudesan, S.Sujatha, R Geetha regarding realization of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Restoration petition Defendant Won