R C P No.69/2022

Case between M. V. Muhammed vs Mr. P. M. Navas regarding eviction

Court

Rent Control Court/Additional Munsiff-II, Kozhikode

Judge

Smt. Meera John.K

Order Date

2025-04-04

Duration

approximately-1 year 21 days

Case Closed

Fri, 04/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

M. V. Muhammed filed a petition seeking eviction of Mr. P. M. Navas under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act. The petitioner alleged non-compliance with a prior order regarding payment of rent arrears.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won

Interim Order

The court ordered that the further proceedings in the rent control petition be stopped, and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the property.

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Vacant possession of the petition schedule property

Case Type

Rent Control Petition

Final Judgment

The court ordered that the further proceedings in the rent control petition be stopped, and the respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the property.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order regarding payment of rent arrears.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The respondent failed to comply with the previous order regarding payment of rent arrears.

Supporting Evidence

The respondent had not complied the order in IA.01/2024 and no sufficient reason is shown as to why deposit is not made as per order in IA.01/2024.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act wherein all the further proceedings in the RCP is stopped. The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: M. V. Muhammed
Party Age: 64
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mr. P. M. Navas
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K. M. Musthafa
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Smt. V. G. Neena
Appearance Type: Assisting Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri. P. G. Sreejith
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction

Outcome: Granted

Description:

The respondent is directed to put the petitioner in vacant possession of the petition schedule property.

Evidence:

Hence, an order is passed under Section 12(3) of the Act wherein all the further proceedings in the RCP is stopped.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Order

Submitted By: Court

Relevance:

The court allowed the petition filed by the petitioner seeking direction to the respondent to pay the arrears of rent.

Reference:

IA.01/2024

Case Classification