Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RCP 98 /2019

Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction.

Court
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II
Judge
Smt. Jomy Anu Isaac
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
approximately-6 years 2 months
Case Code No.
98
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, Pandikasala Vahija and Pandikasala Shahija, filed eviction petitions against various respondents based on their need for the shop rooms for conducting a business. The respondents contested the petitions, claiming they were the rightful tenants and had no alternative accommodation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petitions for eviction, determining the petitioners had a bona fide need for the premises. The respondents were ordered to vacate the premises within two months.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of respondents from the petition schedule shop rooms.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petitions for eviction, determining the petitioners had a bona fide need for the premises. The respondents were ordered to vacate the premises within two months.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the petitioners had a genuine and immediate need for the shop rooms to start their business.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the petitioners had a genuine and immediate need for the shop rooms to start their business.
Supporting Evidence
The petitioners demonstrated their need for the premises based on their economic situation, educational background of their children, and their previous experience in conducting a supermarket.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the RCP’s 98/19, 99/19, 105/19 and 106/19 are allowed as follows: 1. The respondents in RCP’s 98/19, 99/19, 105/19 and 106/19 are hereby directed under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 to hand over vacant possession of the petition schedule shop rooms to the petitioner within two months from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pandikasala Vahija
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pandikasala Shahija
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthafa Alungal
Party Age
67
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
P.Y Sony
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vailassery Gopalakrishnan
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.C. Deepak
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Property tax receipt, Legal heir ship certificate.
Defendants Documents
Copy of GST Registration certificate, Copy of GST returns for the years 2019-2023.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.M. Musthafa
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vidhya.P
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.K. Abhilash Bhaba
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of respondents from the petition schedule shop rooms.
Evidence:
The RCP’s 98/19, 99/19, 105/19 and 106/19 are allowed as follows: The respondents are hereby directed under Section 11(3) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 to hand over vacant possession of the petition schedule shop rooms to the petitioner within two months from the date of this order.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners allowed to recover costs from respondents.
Evidence:
The petitioners are allowed to realise the entire costs of the petition from the respondents.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Property Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These receipts prove ownership of the petitioners over the petition schedule shop rooms.
Reference:
Ext.A1 series, A2 series, A3 series, A4 series, A5 and A6
Document Type: GST Registration Certificate
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Establishes the business legitimacy of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: GST return
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Supports the financial claims of the defendant's business operations.
Reference:
Ext.B2 to B5

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
RCP
Case Code Year
2019

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M. Ramesh vs M/s Saan Popular Finance Pvt. Ltd et al regarding eviction and rent arrears.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Puthukkudy Abdurahiman vs Opal Hotal regarding arrears of rent and eviction.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Devasya vs V. K.Sasi regarding eviction from shop room
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pandikasala Vahija et al vs Musthafa Alungal regarding eviction from shop rooms
Rent Control Court/Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Gangadharan regarding eviction and rent enhancement
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won