Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 76/2024

Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Gangadharan regarding eviction and rent enhancement

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-01-14
Duration
approximately-0 years 1 day
Case Closed
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Suresh Kumar and others seeking eviction of K.T. Gangadharan for non-payment of rent. The respondent has defaulted in paying rent for a shop room owned by the petitioners, leading to this petition for eviction and enhancement of rent.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the petition, fixing the fair rent at Rs.8,000/- per month and ordering the respondent to vacate the premises. It was determined that the respondent failed to pay rent after April 2016 and was therefore liable for eviction.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction of the respondent and fixation of fair rent at Rs.8,000/- per month.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition, fixing the fair rent at Rs.8,000/- per month and ordering the respondent to vacate the premises. It was determined that the respondent failed to pay rent after April 2016 and was therefore liable for eviction.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners proved that the respondent failed to pay rent as required under the lease agreement.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioners proved that the respondent failed to pay rent as required under the lease agreement.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence of PW1 supported by Exts.A1 series & A2 stands unchallenged. There is nothing on record to believe that the respondent has paid the rent.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and section 5 of the Act as follows: 1) The fair rent of the petition schedule shop room is fixed at Rs.8,000/- per month w.e.f 22.08.2024. 2) That the respondent shall put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within one month from today.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh Kumar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valiyaparambath Unnimadhavan
Party Age
71
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
T.K. Surendran
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shyni
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.T. Gangadharan
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of Lawyer notice issued by Adv. K. B. Sahasranaman on behalf of Suresh Kumar to K.T. Gangadharan, Postal receipt, Unclaimed returned registered envelop with acknowledgment card sent by Adv. K. B. Sahasranaman to K.T. Gangadharan.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K.B. Sahasranaman
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Aifa Abdul Rahman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The fair rent of the petition schedule shop room is fixed at Rs.8,000/- per month.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed under section 11(2)(b) and section 5 of the Act as follows: 1) The fair rent of the petition schedule shop room is fixed at Rs.8,000/- per month w.e.f 22.08.2024.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The respondent shall put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within one month.
Evidence:
That the respondent shall put the petitioners in possession of the petition schedule building within one month from today.
Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent under section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Evidence:
Hence he is liable to be vacated under section 11(2)(b).
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petitioners are entitled to realise costs from the respondent.
Evidence:
The petitioners are entitled to realise the costs from the respondent.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to show that a legal notice was served to the respondent for the arrears of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the legal notice to the respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Unclaimed returned registered envelope
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document indicates that the legal notice sent to the respondent was unclaimed.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Gangadharan regarding eviction and rent enhancement
Case Code Year
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Gangadharan regarding eviction and rent enhancement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode Taluk
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 01/10/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 01/14/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between K. Jameela et al vs C.P.M. Alikoya et al regarding eviction of respondents from rent schedule property.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdul Nazar vs M/S. Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society No:3015 et al regarding rent control petition.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Defendant Won
Case between Shri.Salahudhin.V.K vs Havis Nidhi Private Limited regarding eviction
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Venugopal.K.V et al vs Sainaba.N.P et al regarding eviction of tenants.
IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pazhayathoppil Abdu Samad et al vs Saifuddin A. Dhorajiwala et al regarding rent control and fair rent fixation
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won