Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION No. 52/2024

Case between Abdul Nazar vs M/S. Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society No:3015 et al regarding rent control petition.

Court
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
approximately-3 years 9 months
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Abdul Nazar, the petitioner, is seeking to evict the respondents, M/S. Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society No:3015 and others, for non-payment of license fees for shop rooms. The respondents were in possession under a license agreement but have failed to pay their dues since 2023.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the finding that the arrangement constituted a license rather than a lease, making the petition not maintainable against the licensee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the rent control petition due to the finding that the arrangement constituted a license rather than a lease, making the petition not maintainable against the licensee.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the arrangement was a simple license agreement and therefore not subject to rent control provisions.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the arrangement was a simple license agreement and therefore not subject to rent control provisions.
Supporting Evidence
The court is of the view that the intention of the parties has to be considered only if there is any ambiguity in Ext.A1. Here Ext.A1 apparently shows that it is a simple license agreement.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RCP dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Nazar
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Fahad Abdul Nasar
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/S. Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society No:3015
Relation
Represented by Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shabin K.
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Benni T. Joseph
Party Age
58
Relation
President
Plaintiffs Documents
Licence agreement entered into between Abdul Nazar and Shabin K., Copy of Lawyer notice issued by Shahl K. to Agriculture Improvement Co-Operative Society and others.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Shahl K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petitioner sought eviction of the respondents for non-payment of license fees.
Evidence:
Hence a rent control petition is not maintainable against the licensee in occupation.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The document serves as the basis of the rental arrangement between the petitioner and respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the respondents requesting payment for the arrears of license fee.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows proof of sending the notice to the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows proof of sending the notice to the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows proof of sending the notice to the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A3(b)
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms receipt of the notice by the respondents.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Track Consignment of Items
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Provides details on the postal tracking of the notice sent.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Abdul Nazar vs M/S. Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society No:3015 et al regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Abdul Nazar vs M/S. Agricultural Improvement Co-Operative Society No:3015 et al regarding rent control petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Wed, 09/01/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between K. Jameela et al vs C.P.M. Alikoya et al regarding eviction of respondents from rent schedule property.
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shri.Salahudhin.V.K vs Havis Nidhi Private Limited regarding eviction
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Venugopal.K.V et al vs Sainaba.N.P et al regarding eviction of tenants.
IN THE COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Pazhayathoppil Abdu Samad et al vs Saifuddin A. Dhorajiwala et al regarding rent control and fair rent fixation
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Suresh Kumar et al vs K.T. Gangadharan regarding eviction and rent enhancement
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won