Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 87/2022

Case between C.Vasu et al vs Gopikumar regarding eviction.

Court
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER / PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.Meer John K
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

C.Vasu and others filed a petition for eviction against Gopikumar. The court examined a mediation report and accepted its terms.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for eviction was allowed based on the mediation report's terms.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction as per mediation report.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition for eviction was allowed based on the mediation report's terms.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the mediation report are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of the mediation report are lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of mediation report are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the same is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
C.Vasu
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopika Radhakrishnan
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Pradeesh
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhika Sreejith
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Gopikumar
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Mediation Report.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. N.V.P.Rafeeque
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.K.B.Sivaramakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.
Evidence:
Hence, the same is accepted. Petition is allowed in terms of mediation report.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Eviction
Case Code
Case between C.Vasu et al vs Gopikumar regarding eviction.
Case Code Year
Case between C.Vasu et al vs Gopikumar regarding eviction.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Praveen Chandran regarding eviction under rent control act
COURT OF RENT CONTROLLER /PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Mr.Ferose VP vs Mr.Waseem Thondikodan regarding eviction
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between K. Jubairiya et al vs Valiyaveetu Parambil Hamsakoya regarding eviction from leased shop room
RENT CONTROL COURT/ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Shoukkathali et al vs Smt.Sumathi regarding eviction under Rent Control Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between O.K.Lasitha vs Janakiyamma.P.P regarding eviction under KBLR Act
RENT CONTROL COURT/PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won