Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1345/2023

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Vyaparasree Vanitha Sahaya Sangham Group No.O – Two et al regarding Suit for realization of money.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-04
Duration
approximately-7 years 6 months
Case Code No.
1345
Case Closed
Mon, 08/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Vyaparasree Vanitha Sahaya Sangham Group and its members for recovery of an outstanding loan amount. The defendants did not appear in court, leading to the case being heard ex parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the amount due from the defendants along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,91,829/- with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, granting the amount due from the defendants along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to prove the outstanding dues from the defendants.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence to prove the outstanding dues from the defendants.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹2,91,829/- is due from the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,91,829/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety-One Thousand and Eight Hundred Twenty-Nine Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Party Age
32
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vyaparasree Vanitha Sahaya Sangham Group No.O – Two
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vimala.D
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o.Philip
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bency.T
Party Age
46
Relation
W/o. Varghese
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mary Sudha. A
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o. Denson
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ijin.V
Party Age
39
Relation
W/o. Jose
Plaintiffs Documents
Original loan application, Original Promissory note, Original Take Delivery Letter to DPN, True extract of the statement of account, Original Inter-se agreement, Original Articles of Agreement for Linkage Loans to Self Help Groups, Original Acknowledgment of Debt and Security of Borrower/Co-obligant, Legal notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Gayathri R. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Kanjiramattom T.K. Siraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Ganesh Chandran.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Request for recovery of outstanding loan amount.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,91,829/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Ninety-One Thousand and Eight Hundred Twenty-Nine Only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendants and their assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Request for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendants and their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original loan application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented to establish the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Original promissory note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Presented as evidence of the defendants' commitment to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Original Take Delivery Letter to DPN
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence regarding the loan terms agreed upon by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: True extract of the statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the amount outstanding and confirms the non-repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original Inter-Se agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the agreement among group members regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Original Articles of Agreement for Linkage Loans to Self Help Groups
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defines the terms under which the loan was provided to the Self Help Group.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Original Acknowledgment of debt and security of Borrower/Co-obligant
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms ongoing liability for the loan by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to inform the defendants of their outstanding dues.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows proof of receipt of the legal notice by some defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A9 series
Document Type: Returned Advocate Notices
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates attempts to inform the defendants of the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.A10 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 01/23/2018 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 08/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won