Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.899/2024

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Suresh Kumar regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-IV- RCC
Judge
Smt.Salini.B
Order Date
2025-06-21
Duration
approximately-3 years 6 months
Case Code No.
899
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kerala Gramin Bank filed a suit against Suresh Kumar for the realization of a loan amount that had not been repaid. Despite the court's summons, the defendant did not appear, leading to a judgment in favor of the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay Kerala Gramin Bank an amount of Rs.3,11,872/- along with interest. The suit was decided in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's failure to appear.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Decree to realize Rs.3,11,872/- with interest
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, ordering the defendant to pay Kerala Gramin Bank an amount of Rs.3,11,872/- along with interest. The suit was decided in favor of the plaintiff due to the defendant's failure to appear.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved its case through unchallenged evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved its case through unchallenged evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff's unchallenged evidence proves its case and it is entitled to a decree to realise the amount from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.3,11,872/- (Rupees Three lakhs Eleven thousand Eight hundred and Seventy Two only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 12.60% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Gramin Bank
Relation
represented by its Branch Manager, Jyothi P Ninan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Kumar. S
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application dated 17.12.2021, Loan Agreement for Non-Farm Sector Term loans dated 17.12.2021, Copy of Statement of Account dated 31.05.2024, Loan Sanction Communication dated 17.12.2024, Copy of Advocate Notice dated 31.07.2023, Acknowledgment Card dated 04.08.2023
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Gayathri. R. Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kanjiramattom. T.K. Siraj
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Jijith Raj. J.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff sought to recover the loan amount due from the defendant.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs and defendant shall pay an amount of Rs.3,11,872/- (Rupees Three lakhs Eleven thousand Eight hundred and Seventy Two only) to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 12.60% per annum for the principal amount from the date of suit till date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the application for the loan made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Agreement for Non-Farm Sector Term loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document confirming the terms and conditions agreed upon for the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of Statement of Account with Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document detailing the financial transactions indicating the amount owed.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Loan Sanction communication
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document that informs the defendant about the approval of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Advocate Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice sent to the defendant regarding the debt repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document providing proof of receipt of the advocate notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Fri, 12/17/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 06/21/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won