Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 446/2024

Case between Kerala Grameena Bank vs Musthak Ali. K. V regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Anjali.P
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-5 years 5 months
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Grameena Bank, filed a suit against the defendant, Musthak Ali. K. V, for recovery of a loan amount due to default in repayment. The defendant had taken a loan of Rs.1,10,000 and has not repaid any amount despite receiving notice.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount due along with interest. The defendant is also required to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs.31,991/- from the defendant with interest at the rate of 9.25 percent from date of suit till date of decree and future interest at the rate of 6 percent from the date of decree till date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to recover the amount due along with interest. The defendant is also required to pay the costs of the proceedings.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The suit was proven by the unchallenged oral testimony of the plaintiff's witness and the evidence produced.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The suit was proven by the unchallenged oral testimony of the plaintiff's witness and the evidence produced.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff is proved by the unchallenged oral testimony of the PW1 and the exhibits A1 to A7 documents produced by him.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, 1.The plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs.31,991/- (Rupees Thirty one thousand nine hundred and ninety one) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 9.25 per cent from date of suit till date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6 per cent from the date of decree till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Grameena Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Musthak Ali. K. V
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan agreement dated 26.06.2020, Take delivery letter, Demand promissory note, Account statement, Acknowledgment of debt and security, Lawyer notice issued to the defendant, Acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. A. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. K. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amaya
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abdul Raoof. V. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Narayanan. V. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's claim to recover the loan amount with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs.31,991/- (Rupees Thirty one thousand nine hundred and ninety one) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 9.25 per cent from date of suit till date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Cost of the proceedings to be paid by the defendant to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant as part of the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Take delivery letter to Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant as part of the loan documentation.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Executed by the defendant to formalize the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the financial transactions related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document signed by the defendant acknowledging debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the plaintiff to remind the defendant of the default.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of receipt of the notice by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Grameena Bank vs Musthak Ali. K. V regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Grameena Bank vs Musthak Ali. K. V regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 06/26/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won