Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 288/2024

Case between Kerala Grameena Bank vs Louis Samson regarding realization of money

Court
THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Anjali.P
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
approximately-4 years 2 months
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Kerala Grameena Bank, granted a loan to the defendant, Louis Samson, who defaulted on repayment. The bank subsequently filed a suit to recover the outstanding loan amount.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to realize a specified sum from the defendant along with interest and costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs.16,935 with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, allowing them to realize a specified sum from the defendant along with interest and costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff proved the case through unchallenged oral testimony and relevant documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff proved the case through unchallenged oral testimony and relevant documents.
Supporting Evidence
The case of the plaintiff is proved by the unchallenged oral testimony of the PW1 and the exhibits A1 to A6 documents produced by her.

Judgment Evidence:

The plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs.16,935 (Rupees Sixteen thousand nine hundred and thirty five only) from the defendant with interest at the rate of 10 per cent from date of suit till date of decree and with future interest at the rate of 6 per cent from the date of decree till date of realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kerala Grameena Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Louis Samson
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan agreement dated 31.08.2021, take delivery letter to demand promissory note, demand promissory note, account statement, lawyer notice, undelivered cover.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. K. Ramachandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Abdul Raof
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ameya. V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a sum of money from the defendant with interest.
Evidence:
The result states, 'The plaintiff shall be entitled to realize Rs.16,935 from the defendant with interest at the rate of 10 percent from date of suit till date of decree.'
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant shall pay the costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The judgment includes the statement, 'The defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiff.'

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as the loan agreement executed by the defendant for the loan granted by the plaintiff bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Take delivery letter to Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter was executed by the defendant to acknowledge receipt of the promissory note.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the promissory note executed by the defendant with the obligation to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This account statement details the transactions related to the loan from the start date to the specified date.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was issued by the plaintiff to the defendant demanding repayment of the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt serves as proof of sending the notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Undelivered cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the notice sent to the defendant was not delivered.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Kerala Grameena Bank vs Louis Samson regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Kerala Grameena Bank vs Louis Samson regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 08/31/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 11/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S Cut Man Gents Beauty Parlour et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Bank et al vs M/s. A J Advisory Services et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank Peruvayal Branch vs Sri.Mohanan.K.K regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Samson @ Louis Samsom regarding loan repayment
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs Mr Fahad Rahman P P et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won