Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.595/2023

Case between Karnataka Bank Limited vs Jayan.B regarding Suit for realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months 22 days
Case Code No.
595
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Karnataka Bank Limited filed a suit against Jayan.B for the recovery of ₹5,52,755.70 due to an unpaid loan. The defendant failed to repay despite multiple reminders and a breach of the loan agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹5,52,755.70 from the defendant along with interest and costs. The case was decided in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹5,52,755.70 with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization and also recover the costs of the suit.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that the plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹5,52,755.70 from the defendant along with interest and costs. The case was decided in favor of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the defendant's failure to repay the amount due.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the defendant's failure to repay the amount due.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence adduced by PW1 proves that an amount of 5,52,755.70/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifty-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-five and Seventy paise only) is due from the defendant. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹5,52,755.70/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifty-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-five and Seventy paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Karnataka Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayan.B
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original demand promissory note, Original Take Delivery Letter, Original Hypothecation Agreement, Recall notice, Bank statement, Original MSME loan application, Original credit sanction intimation
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G.S. Kalkura
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Suresh Babu.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Bhavya A.B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Parvathy.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Anupama. B
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Kiran.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amritha M. Nair
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹5,52,755.70 with interest.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (a)The plaintiff is entitled to recover an amount of ₹5,52,755.70/- (Rupees Five Lakhs Fifty-Two Thousand Seven Hundred Fifty-five and Seventy paise only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit until the date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of this suit.
Evidence:
In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: (b)The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is signed by the defendant and was used to establish the loan agreement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Take Delivery Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is signed by the defendant and is part of the loan documentation.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is signed by the defendant, detailing the hypothecation related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Recall Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent to the defendant regarding the outstanding loan repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the loan account details and confirms the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: MSME Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This application signed by the defendant is part of the loan evidence.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Credit Sanction Intimation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the loan being sanctioned to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report was included as court evidence during the proceedings.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Wed, 05/05/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won