Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1621/2017

Case between K. Madhu vs K. Sathikumar regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-26
Duration
approximately-8 years 5 months
Case Code No.
1621
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

K. Madhu, the plaintiff, is seeking to recover arrears of rent from K. Sathikumar, the defendant, who defaulted on payments after renting a property. The court has found in favor of the plaintiff due to sufficient evidence of the defendant's debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed that K. Madhu is entitled to recover ₹ 39,220 from K. Sathikumar along with interest and costs. The decision was based on the evidence of rental agreements and non-payment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of ₹ 39,220 with 6% interest and costs from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed that K. Madhu is entitled to recover ₹ 39,220 from K. Sathikumar along with interest and costs. The decision was based on the evidence of rental agreements and non-payment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff established the defendant's liability to pay the claimed amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff established the defendant's liability to pay the claimed amount.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of 39,220/- (Rupees Thirty-Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty only) is due from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 39,220/- (Rupees Thirty-Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit, till date of realization from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
K. Madhu
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Sathikumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Agreement dated 29.04.2017, Copy of Lawyers Notice dated 13.10.2017, Postal receipt evidencing dispatch, Original returned Advocate’s Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. V.A.Jayaraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.J.R. Unnikrishnan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff's entitlement to realize an amount of ₹39,220 with interest
Evidence:
The suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 39,220/- (Rupees Thirty-Nine Thousand Two Hundred and Twenty only) with 6% interest from the date of the suit, till date of realization from the defendant and his assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Costs of the suit to be realized from the defendant
Evidence:
b) The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Original agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the rental agreement and acknowledgment of arrears
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of Lawyers Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued to the defendant for payment of dues
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of dispatch of the lawyer's notice
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original returned Advocate’s Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the defendant's refusal to accept the notice
Reference:
Ext.A4

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017

Case Flags

Arrest Involved

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 04/29/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won