Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No.468/2025

Case between Jameela et al vs Biju.N.C regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of license fee and damages.

Court
Court of Additional Munsiff - II, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-11-24
Duration
approximately-1 year 23 days
Case Closed
Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Jameela and Shaijal, are seeking a mandatory injunction against the defendant, Biju.N.C, for failing to vacate the licensed premises and for unpaid license fees. The defendant did not appear in court, leading to a judgment against him.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to vacate the premises and pay the plaintiffs arrears of license fee and damages.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to vacate the plaint schedule property and pay a total of Rs 99,750/- with interest as arrears of license fee and damages.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendant to vacate the premises and pay the plaintiffs arrears of license fee and damages.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiffs provided evidence of the license agreement and the defendant's failure to pay the required fees.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiffs provided evidence of the license agreement and the defendant's failure to pay the required fees.
Supporting Evidence
The PW1 has deposed that the defendant has kept license fee in arrears for 3 months. Hence, the license agreement has been terminated as per the exhibit A2 notice. Hence, the plaintiff is entitled to a decree of mandatory injunction as prayed for.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows:- 1. Defendant is hereby directed by a decree of mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within 45 days from today failing which the plaintiffs shall be at liberty to execute the same through the process of court and realise the costs for the same from the defendant. 2. The defendant shall pay Rs 62,250/- to the plaintiff with interest at the rate of 6 per cent from the date of suit till the date of realisation as arrears of license fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Jameela
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Shaijal
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sharmina
Party Age
45
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayishabi
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Biju.N.C
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Exhibit A1 is the license agreement executed between the plaintiff and defendant dated 01.11.2024, Exhibit A2 is the office copy of the lawyer notice dated 16.06.2025 with postal receipt and acknowledgment card.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.R.M.Subair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C.P.Sameera
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.Aysha Misna
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant directed to vacate the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Defendant is hereby directed by a decree of mandatory injunction to vacate the plaint schedule property within 45 days from today.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs 62,250/- as arrears of license fee.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay Rs 62,250/- as arrears of license fee.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay Rs 37,500/- as damages for use and occupation.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay Rs 37,500/- as damages for use and occupation.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to Rs 25,000/- per month until property is surrendered.
Evidence:
The Plaintiff shall be entitled to realise Rs 25,000/- per month from date of suit till the date of surrender of plaint schedule property.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings.
Evidence:
The defendant shall pay costs of the proceedings to the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: License Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidencing the licensee licensor relationship and terms for termination.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifying the defendant of license termination due to arrears.
Reference:
Ext.A2

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Jameela et al vs Biju.N.C regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of license fee and damages.
Case Code Year
Case between Jameela et al vs Biju.N.C regarding mandatory injunction and realization of arrears of license fee and damages.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 11/24/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.K.Chidanand vs Shahabas regarding mandatory injunction and licence fee arrears.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr.Brijosh.K vs P.K.Gireesh regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Valappil Abdurahiman vs Maliyekkal Fasil regarding mandatory injunction and arrears of license fee
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kozhikode District Co-operative Bank Limited et al vs Abdul Nazar.P regarding mandatory injunction and damages.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.V.Abu Faizal vs Smt.Saajitha.T regarding realisation of arrears of rent
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won