Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.842/1996

Case between Gopkumar.B vs Sankarapilla Sivathanu Pilla et al regarding partition of property.

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Judge
Sri.Manesh.S.V
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
Case Code No.
842
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Gopkumar.B filed a petition to be added as a necessary party in the final decree proceedings of a suit for partition. The defendants contested this, arguing that he was a stranger to the proceedings and had no standing.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the petition filed by Gopkumar.B to be added to the final decree proceedings, deeming him a stranger to the case without a recognized entitlement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Partition Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition filed by Gopkumar.B to be added to the final decree proceedings, deeming him a stranger to the case without a recognized entitlement.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the petitioner did not have a recognized claim in the original suit and thus cannot intervene at the final decree stage.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the petitioner did not have a recognized claim in the original suit and thus cannot intervene at the final decree stage.
Supporting Evidence
The present attempt of the petitioner is to get impleaded in the FDA proceedings. But since no preliminary decree was passed in his favour or 29th defendant, his purported claims cannot be adjudicated in the final decree proceedings.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition stands dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Gopkumar.B
Party Age
63
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sankarapilla Sivathanu Pilla
Party Age
75
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kolammalkumaraswami Pilla
Party Age
70
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kumaraswami Pilla
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Krishnakumari
Party Age
45
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.A.Chandrasekharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Kuttappan Thazhassery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Thonnakkal.G.Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Partition Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
1996

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Sarojini.K.P vs Vikraman et al regarding partition of property
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Partition Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won