Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.620/2024

Case between The Federal Bank vs Arun.S.S regarding realisation of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-08-27
Duration
Case Code No.
620
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Federal Bank Ltd., filed a suit against the defendant, Arun.S.S, for the recovery of a personal loan amounting to ₹2,66,930.37 due to non-payment. The defendant failed to appear in court and was represented ex-parte.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹2,66,930.37 with interest and costs due to the default in loan repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,66,930.37 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum and costs of the suit from the defendant.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹2,66,930.37 with interest and costs due to the default in loan repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated that the defendant was liable for the loan amount.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence presented by the plaintiff demonstrated that the defendant was liable for the loan amount.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 proves that an amount of ₹2,66,930.37 is due from the defendant. There is no evidence on record indicating that the defendant has discharged this liability to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a) The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,66,930.37 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendant and his assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
The Federal Bank
Relation
represented by its Authorised Officer Anoop.A. Antony
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Arun.S.S
Party Age
29
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
BYOM online loan statement, Copy of the legal notice, Postal receipt, Unclaimed notice, Statement account
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.R. Presith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.S. Rekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover ₹2,66,930.37 with interest from the defendant.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,66,930.37/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and his assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: BYOM Online loan statement with general terms and conditions
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the loan agreement and terms which establish the basis for the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of the legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a formal notification to the defendant regarding the outstanding loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidences the dispatch of the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Unclaimed Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows that the defendant did not accept the notice sent by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the account history, showing the outstanding balance owed by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 11/16/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won