Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.1985/2022

Case between Federal Bank Limited vs Sheela Thomas regarding suit for realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-07-31
Duration
approximately-5 years 4 months 21 days
Case Code No.
1985
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Federal Bank Limited, has filed a suit against the defendant, Sheela Thomas, for the recovery of a loan amount that was not repaid. The defendant took a loan of ₹3,51,000 but failed to make the repayments despite multiple reminders.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of Federal Bank Limited, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendant was found liable for the amount due.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹3,54,263.41 with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of Federal Bank Limited, allowing them to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest. The defendant was found liable for the amount due.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the default in payment by the defendant.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided sufficient evidence of the loan agreement and the default in payment by the defendant.
Supporting Evidence
The oral and documentary evidence presented by PW1 establishes that a sum of 3,54,263.41/- is due and payable by the defendant. The documents produced by the plaintiff show that the defendant is liable to pay this amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result; the suit is decreed as follows: a)The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 3,54,263.41/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendant and her assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Federal Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sheela Thomas
Party Age
54
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil BYOM online loan statement, Copy of Legal Notice, Postal receipt, Unserved Notice, Statement of account
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S.R. Presith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. S. Rekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the outstanding loan amount along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of 3,54,263.41/-(Rupees Three Lakhs Fifty-Four Thousand Two Hundred Sixty-Three and Paise Forty-One only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit until the date of realization, from the defendant and her assets.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of this suit from the defendant and her assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: BYOM online loan statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document shows the terms and conditions of the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This legal notice was issued to the defendant regarding the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This receipt evidences the dispatch of the legal notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Unserved notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This indicates that the legal notice could not be served to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the outstanding amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 09/17/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank (South Malabar Gramin Bank) vs Sadasivan P. regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Canara Bank vs Rajaneesh A.R regarding realization of money.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Sukumari.C regarding Suit for realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Jayakumar. R.V regarding realisation of money.
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Benoy Francis regarding realization of money
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won