Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.482/2023

Case between Daisy Rani Hemilton vs Joseph Gomez regarding cancellation of sale deed and mandatory injunction

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Judge
Smt. Sincy Jacob
Order Date
2025-08-05
Duration
Case Code No.
482
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Daisy Rani Hemilton filed a suit against Joseph Gomez seeking cancellation of a sale deed she allegedly signed under duress due to her mental health issues. The plaintiff claims that the defendant took advantage of her condition and defrauded her of her property rights.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted the plaintiff's petition to restrain the defendant from alienating the plaint schedule property during the pendency of the original suit. The petition was allowed based on the presence of a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is restrained from alienating the plaint schedule property.
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court granted the plaintiff's petition to restrain the defendant from alienating the plaint schedule property during the pendency of the original suit. The petition was allowed based on the presence of a prima facie case and balance of convenience in favor of the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case indicating that the sale deed was fraudulently obtained.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff established a prima facie case indicating that the sale deed was fraudulently obtained.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff has established a serious question to be tried, that is, whether the Ext.A1 sale deed is fraudulently obtained and is void for want of consideration.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, petition is allowed. The defendant is restrained from alienating the plaint schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Daisy Rani Hemilton
Party Age
51
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Joseph Gomez
Party Age
52
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical certificate, bank statements, passbooks
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Beyline Das.Y
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Thonnackal G.Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff requested to restrain the defendant from alienating the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
In the result, petition is allowed. The defendant is restrained from alienating the plaint schedule property.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced to show the financial status of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Medical Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the plaintiff was inpatient at the time of the sale deed.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Bank Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to argue about the non-receipt of sale consideration.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Bank Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Similar to Ext.A3, shows the financial transactions related to the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Joint Account Pass Book
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates a financial connection between the plaintiff and the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Reported on the possession of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type: Sketch
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Accompanies the commission report, providing a visual context.
Reference:
Ext.C1(a)

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Thiruvananthapuram
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between A.M.Shanavas vs A.Nizarudeen, Venugopal Nair regarding temporary injunction.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Jayasree.V vs Sreekumar.S.V regarding injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sunilkumar. K.V vs Rajeev kumar et al regarding temporary injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Sajikumar vs Ramani et al regarding injunction application.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Jayasree C.R vs Rajendran.C.V regarding Mandatory Injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II
Injunction Plaintiff Won